About Me

Name: Jason Cunningham
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

What's Good for the Gays is Good for the ________

According to logic, the California Supreme Court's recent ruling in favor of same-sex marriage means that the following groups should also be allowed to "right" to "marriage": bisexuals (e.g., a woman "marrying" a man and another woman), polygamists, polyandrists (a woman with multiple husbands), bestialists (a human "marrying" one or more animals), incestuous couples, pansexuals, and adult-child couples. In other words, any type of romantic/sexual relationship should now be given full creedence and protection under the law.
 
And if one or more of these groups aren't allowed to engage in "marriage," then neither should homosexuals be allowed to.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Texas Court Gets It Right

A Texas appeals court ruled Thursday that the state had no right to seize children from the polygamist sect at the Yearning For Zion Ranch. It ruled correctly.
 
The primary point in this case is not whether anyone agrees with the sect's beliefs -- I certainly disagree with the group on many points -- but whether the state had a right to intervene as it did. The answer is 'no'; this episode started with a phone call for help from a girl whom authorities haven't been able to track down, leading many to believe that the S.O.S. was an H.O.A.X. Essentially, therefore, the state considered the accusation from one unidentified person as enough evidence that something fishy was going on at the ranch and that an invasion of it was warranted. This is not intervention; this is interference.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Addendum to 'Judicial Math'

I forgot to mention the most fundamental aspect of the entire same-sex marriage issue: Homosexual acts are wrong. Period. It's contrary to nature and nature's God. It's one thing for people to say they approve of homosexuality -- they do have the right to their opinion -- but it's a travesty when they try to rationalize it using Scripture. The Bible is crystal clear on this: Engaging in homosexual acts is sinful. I know that it's a personal issue that hits home with a lot of people (including myself), but my criticisms are not intended as personal attacks. It's simply a case of right vs. wrong, and the homosexual lifestyle is wrong.
 
Of course, this issue, including the current happenings in California, highlight the double-standard our society is practicing: Homosexuality is okay but polygamy is wrong. How can that be? If one "alternate definition" of marriage is acceptable, why not all others? Conversely, if one "alternate definition" of marriage is unacceptable, why not all others? People who support same-sex marriage have absolutely no call condemning polygamy. If people disagree with the underage-marriage aspect of polygamy, I understand that -- but even then society is being somewhat hypocritical, because with one side of its mouth it's protesting underage marriage, while out of the other side of its mouth it's granting approval to underage abortions (without even so much as parental consent, in some cases). This isn't to mention the fact that these polygamist sects are living in the 1800s -- when it was common for young girls to be married. But do we consider those marriages of olden days "rape"? I'm not saying that rape never occurs in these cults; it may, and if so, it's wrong. But for a society that is so much about being "progressive" and sexually permissive and letting everyone do their own thing without interference, it amazes me, angers me, that so many people are wanting to interfere with polygamist groups -- while not even batting a lash at the legalization of "gay" marriage and the usurpation of the people's will. Complete inconsistency. Complete hypocrisy.
 
I know, I know. It's about "the children." Give me a break. If our society truly cared about children to the degree it should, our culture wouldn't be encouraging sexual promiscuity. But we have individuals and groups in this country -- plenty of them, particularly Planned Parenthood -- who find it perfectly acceptable for 12-year-old girls to have "consensual" sex (like that's really possible) and abortions. Who think schools are supposed to be birth-control dispensaries instead of educational institutions. Who think kids actually have "rights" over their parents.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »