Posted by
Jason Cunningham on Friday, May 23, 2008 1:35:21 AM
According to logic, the California Supreme Court's recent ruling in favor of same-sex marriage means that the following groups should also be allowed to "right" to "marriage": bisexuals (e.g., a woman "marrying" a man and another woman), polygamists, polyandrists (a woman with multiple husbands), bestialists (a human "marrying" one or more animals), incestuous couples, pansexuals, and adult-child couples. In other words, any type of romantic/sexual relationship should now be given full creedence and protection under the law.
And if one or more of these groups aren't allowed to engage in "marriage," then neither should homosexuals be allowed to.