About Me

Name: Jason Cunningham
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Get Expelled: Evolutionary Thinking, Part II

   The primary point of Ben Stein's movie "Expelled" is highly valid, and appropo to my last post: The science establishment shouldn't be dogmatically loyal to anything other than what verifiable empirical evidence shows to be indisputable ... and evolution hardly fits that bill.
 
Let me again be clear: I'm not opposed to the possibility that species-to-species evolution is real. I'm also unconvinced that God's act of creation was a literal 6-day process that occurred no more than 12,000 years ago. I'm a Christian who believes that God is responsible for the creation of everything that does exist, ever has existed or ever will exist in the universe, including the universe itself, and that He could have employed (or could still be employing) species-to-species evolution as one of His creative methods.
 
All of that said, I also believe that evolution (at least, as we understand it) could not account for the origin of life (because something cannot evolve from nothing), and that today's science establishment is woefully closed off to the idea of "following wherever the evidence leads." I understand that God cannot be empirically "proved" (physically weighed, measured, etc.), but it's absolutely absurd that Big Science refuses to even entertain the possibility that there's a design in nature and, therefore, that there may be an intelligence behind it all. Nor should the textbooks or other science literature of public (taxpayer-funded) educational institutions be telling that students that evolution equals atheism, or that atheism is essential to a proper approach to science, or that the pursuit of science inevitably leads to atheism.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Atheists Gone Wild

As much as the "new atheists" rub me the wrong way, I'm glad that they're shooting themselves in their feet with publicly advertised ridiculousness.
 
Take, for example, the verbally rabid Richard Dawkins -- really, please: take him away, white-coated men. This man who supposedly prides himself on rigorous scientific research is so scared of the possibility of God that he confesses -- when pressed by Ben Stein in "Expelled" -- his belief that the seeding of life on Earth by aliens is more likely than the existence of God. This from a man who thinks Christians are living in a fantasy world.
 
Then there's Peter "Der Feuhrer" Stringer, an atheist so radical that he has no qualms suggesting that parents ought to be able to kill their babies as late as 28 days after birth. Yes, it's crazy. He's crazy. Maybe not in the clinical sense, but in the sense of what can (and does) happen when people eliminate God from every facet of their lives. Such drastic action creates a slippery slope that knows no bounds -- no, Mr. Hitchens, et al., your "evolution-based" morality has no constraints, because it does not exist. This is why/how society is able to devolve from one that abhors abortion to one that calls an unborn baby a mere lump of flesh -- and, now, to one (in some circles, at least) that considers babies 28 days old or younger expendable.
 
What many people don't realize is that people are sheep, and as such will -- must -- follow someone or something. In the absence of God, there are many things they might follow: lust, power, greed ... in other words, their own selfish tastes and desires, which vary from person to person, thus disproving the notion of a well-defined "universal evolution-based morality" and preventing a societal moral consensus other than "anything goes."
 
As glad as I am that many of the "new atheists" are showing off their foolishness, I hope even more that society in general realizes what's going on and being said. Otherwise, none of us save the select powerful few will have any control over our lives. Already, we have atheists such as Hitchens calling it child abuse for parents to teach religion to their children, and saying that the government ought to be able to step in and take over in such situations. Do you want that? Today's liberals chasten the Bush administration for alleged civil-rights abuses, but nothing the Bush administration has done can hold a candle to what atheists desire for you and I. And their method of operation is the double-standard typical of those who desire power at all costs: they rail against the teaching of religion in public schools (even in religion and philosophy classes) yet work hard to make sure that an atheistic form of evolution is taught in classrooms, as opposed to simply presenting the scientific facts and letting students draw their own conclusions about the universe.
 
*** Everybody: Go see Ben Stein's "Expelled" ***
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »